[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:35:29 +0300 |
Kevin Fox <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> I can't see any way that a program receiving a signal like SIGCONT
> during a partial read and it not properly handling the partial read
> response would not be considered a bug.
Tar handles that case and retries the read, *if* it is able to handle
the delivered signal (see the safe_read function). SIGSTOP cannot be
handled in principle. SIGCONT is normally sent only by debuggers.
Regards,
Sergey
- [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/28