[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume heade
|
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:19:12 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
nail 11.22 3/20/05 |
"Sergey Poznyakoff" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Curt Blank <address@hidden> ha escrit:
>
> > Is this ever going to be addressed when spanning tapes?
>
> It has been addressed quite a while ago (around v1.16, 2005). Try
> --format=pax, it does not have this limitation.
Does this mean you introduced an incompatible alternative for multi-volume
or did you reimplement the star method?
Jörg
--
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni)
address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Curt Blank, 2007/11/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/11/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Joerg Schilling, 2007/11/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Tim Kientzle, 2007/11/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Joerg Schilling, 2007/11/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Tim Kientzle, 2007/11/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Joerg Schilling, 2007/11/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Curt Blank, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] file name too long to be stored in a GNU multivolume header, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/11/29