[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support
From: |
Ian Turner |
Subject: |
[Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:47:21 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Friday 23 September 2005 11:46, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Ian Turner <address@hidden> writes:
> > Why don't we put a patch now for --preserve-atime=system, and we can
> > add --preserve-atime=heuristic when kernel support exists, since
> > that might take some time?
>
> (no pun intended :-). Yes, I guess that makes sense for now.
OK. Here's a revised patch. It doesn't touch the configure system, and it
doesn't introduce a new option. You can do --atime-preserve,
--atime-preserve=replace, or --atime-preserve=system. If O_NOATIME isn't
defined at compile time, --atime-preserve=system will generate a usage error
message.
I wasn't sure about the right way to document the --atime-preserve option.
Right now I define the argument as "replace|=system", so that --help shows
--atime-preserve[=replace|=system]. But this strikes me as a hack. Let me
know if you have a better idea.
Cheers,
--Ian
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, Ian Turner, 2005/09/22
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, Ian Turner, 2005/09/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/21
- Message not available
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/21
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Ian Turner, 2005/09/22
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/22
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Ian Turner, 2005/09/23
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/23
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support,
Ian Turner <=
- Message not available
- [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support, Ian Turner, 2005/09/27