[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backup?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
[Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backup? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:12:56 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
If you run a full backup like this:
rm foo.snap
tar czpSf foo.tgz --listed-incremental=foo.snap
and then later just want to restore just that one full backup, is it
OK to do this:
tar xzpSf foo.tgz
or do you need to keep the foo.snap file around and specify
--listed-incremental=foo.snap during the extract?
Thanks, and if possible, please CC me in any replies as I'm not
currently subscribed to the list.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- [Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backup?,
Rob Browning <=