[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-patch] lin should be ssize_t, not off_t
|
From: |
Tobias Stoeckmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-patch] lin should be ssize_t, not off_t |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:04:32 +0100 |
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > Without such a switch, way too large lins are parsed without errors,
> > exceeding limits in various parts of the source.
>
> Shouldn't we instead fix the code where it is currently broken?
I just see than plan b can support an off_t amount of lines... I have
to reevaluate this, probably my concern is void.
Tobias