[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:42:36 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Gruenbacher <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:15:14 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> When you apply diff to CRLF files, you get a patch with LF endings i the
> headers and CRLF endings in the old/new and context lines. (At least on
> POSIX; on Windows, I would expect not.)
The same will happen on Windows if you use the --binary switch to
Diff when producing the diffs.
- [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/15
- [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/15
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/15
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/16
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/16
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/16
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Micah Cowan, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/18