[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPT: evms vs. parted
|
From: |
leslie . polzer |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPT: evms vs. parted |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:14:04 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) |
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:59:27AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Not having dug into the details of GPT disk labels, I can't say which
> program is wrong, but clearly at least one of them is. Is this a known
> issue? Anyone have any idea what the source of the discrepancy is?
Try it with GNU Parted 1.8, which will be released in less than a week.
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
pgpZmXSsqyfsu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- GPT: evms vs. parted, Andrew Schulman, 2006/09/05
- Re: GPT: evms vs. parted,
leslie . polzer <=
- Re: Parted 1.8, translation?, Benno Schulenberg, 2006/09/05
- Re: Parted 1.8, translation?, leslie . polzer, 2006/09/06
- Re: Parted 1.8, translation?, Benno Schulenberg, 2006/09/06
- Re: Parted 1.8, translation?, leslie . polzer, 2006/09/06
- Re: Parted 1.8, translation?, Benno Schulenberg, 2006/09/06