Re: Schedule migration from CVS to Subversion

[K.G.]

On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:22:42 -0300 Otavio Salvador <address@hidden> wrote:

> Håkon Løvdal <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
> >
> > I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared
> > them, and stable contained several things not merged to devel (unit,
> > some constraint handling, etc). So unless someone is willing to 
> > do a job and bring devel completely up to date compared to stable
> > and has active plans for continuing to use and update devel I would
> > recommend not importing it (for now. It can always be imported later if 
> > needed).
> 
> I think the best is to import it and later remove it. Since we'll
> already have all his history important and allow everybody to check
> things using it.
> 
Indeed there's absolutly nothing but useless forking changelog informations
in devel, that is not already in stable... There used to be some HFS
improvement before I merged them in stable, but now devel is just an old
stable version (or a mix of old stable versions)...
That said, i'm only giving information, and if for any reason somebody
really wants devel to be imported in svn that wont make me cry :)

Cheers,
Guillaume Knispel