[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 02:55:03 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hi Gareth,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:32:37PM +0000, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Apparently the absolute minimum for any dos related filesystem in
> gparted is 16Mb.
Parted doesn't support FAT12. FAT16 has a minimum size of about 32Mb, if
I remember correctly. (How did you get 16Mb?)
The partition table alignment constraints (CHS stuff) can be overridden
if you are using libparted directly. (You can use ped_constraint_exact().)
Cheers,
Andrew
- Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes,
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/05
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/07
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/07
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Andrew Clausen, 2005/03/08
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/08
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, B.Hakvoort, 2005/03/09
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/09
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, K.G., 2005/03/04
- Re: Problem with minimum partition sizes, Gareth Bult, 2005/03/04