Re: Unescaped dash in tset.1

[Thomas Dickey]

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for doing the boring work of fixing the dashes in the manpages in
> the 20100731 patch.  However, there is one instance that you have
> overlooked and that lintian still reports:

thanks (looks as if I was searching for ".-[^\-]", and forgot "^-[^\-]").

> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> diff --git a/man/tset.1 b/man/tset.1
> index ed79416..99f12f3 100644
> --- a/man/tset.1
> +++ b/man/tset.1
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ The \fB\-a\fR, \fB\-d\fR, and \fB\-p\fR options are 
> similarly
> not documented or useful, but were retained as they appear to be in
> widespread use.  It is strongly recommended that any usage of these
> three options be changed to use the \fB\-m\fR option instead.  The
> --n option remains, but has no effect.  The \fB\-adnp\fR options are therefore
> +\-n option remains, but has no effect.  The \fB\-adnp\fR options are therefore
> omitted from the usage summary above.
> .PP
> It is still permissible to specify the \fB\-e\fR, \fB\-i\fR, and \fB\-k\fR 
> options without
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Cheers,
>       Sven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-ncurses mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ncurses

--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net