[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-mit-scheme] [bug #31014] Object reference as operator expression
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Bug-mit-scheme] [bug #31014] Object reference as operator expression |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 03:41:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.1 Safari/533.17.8 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31014>
Summary: Object reference as operator expression
Project: MIT/GNU Scheme
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Sat 11 Sep 2010 03:41:29 AM UTC
Category: runtime
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Incorrect behavior
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Kyle Miller
Originator Email: address@hidden
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Keywords:
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The following transcript explains the problem:
1 ]=> (lambda (x) 3)
;Value 11: #[compound-procedure 11]
1 ]=> #[compound-procedure 11]
;Value 11: #[compound-procedure 11]
1 ]=> (#[compound-procedure 11] 2)
;The object #[compound-procedure 11], passed as an argument to
make-combination, is not an operator expression.
;To continue, call RESTART with an option number:
; (RESTART 1) => Return to read-eval-print level 1.
2 error> ((lambda (x) (x 2)) #[compound-procedure 11])
;Value: 3
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31014>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-mit-scheme] [bug #31014] Object reference as operator expression,
anonymous <=