|
From: | Barath Aron |
Subject: | Re: posix_spawn() instead of fork()? |
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:28:55 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 03/14/2018 10:21 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
You might get lucky, but the maintainer probably has many other things to do - your chances will be considerably better if you write a patch that does it and offer that as implementation. So perhaps a better question to ask would be "Would you be receptive to a patch implementing an alternate version ..." Eddy.
You have right. But at least my implicit question got answered: no one is working on the posix_spawn() implementation. :) Unfortunatelly, now I'm rewriting the calc's [1] configure [2] mechanism, because it cannot handle cross-compilation.
After I'm done with it, I'll jump into the posix_spawn() thing. Áron [1] http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/ [2] svn://repo.hu/calc-scc/trunk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |