[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects) |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:28:19 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:57:23 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>, "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>
> Since you can't (in my recent experience) load a 64-bit DLL into a 32-bit
> program, the real issue is what architecture was make itself built with.
That's unrelated. I was talking about the fact that
load foo.so
is inherently non-portable, whereas
load foo
or
load foo$(SOEXT)
(with $(SOEXT) determined automatically by Make) is much more
portable.
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), (continued)
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), David Boyce, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), David Boyce, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Edward Welbourne, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Tim Murphy, 2013/04/30
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), David Boyce, 2013/04/30
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Tim Murphy, 2013/04/30
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/30
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Paul Smith, 2013/04/30
- Re: dynamic object searching (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Tim Murphy, 2013/04/30
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Tim Murphy, 2013/04/29
- memory allocation (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: memory allocation, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29