[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j
From: |
David Boyce |
Subject: |
Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:12:16 -0400 |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> David, can you explain why you needed to lock the files? Also, what
> region(s) of the file you are locking? fcntl with F_WRLCK won't work
> on Windows, so the question is how to emulate it.
I was about to write this up but I see Paul beat me to it ...
> Finally, I'd suggest that the system-dependent portions of sync_output
> be factored out into a separate function, so that the Windows port
> could have its own implementation without infesting job.c with yet
> another bunch of #ifdef's.
Agree. Ifdef bad. Just wanted to see if the feature would be favorably
looked on first. I can't actually do the Windows etc ports but I could
certainly refactor it with stubs.
David
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, (continued)
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j,
David Boyce <=
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15