[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x]
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x] |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:30:55 +0200 |
Hi Paul,
> However, it seems to be a bug that the third argument to strtok_r()
> in lines 2431, 2439, and 2446 of libproto/imap/folder.c is &sp instead
> of &sp1.
Yes, it definitely is. Please try the attached patch. Does it work for
you?
Regards,
Sergey
diff --git a/libproto/imap/folder.c b/libproto/imap/folder.c
index 944e9b2..2a9e6bb 100644
--- a/libproto/imap/folder.c
+++ b/libproto/imap/folder.c
@@ -2428,23 +2428,27 @@ imap_parse (f_imap_t f_imap)
/* Followed by a decimal number, indicates the next
unique identifier value. Refer to section 2.3.1.1
for more information. */
- char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp);
- f_imap->selected->uidnext = strtol (value, NULL, 10);
+ char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp1);
+ if (value)
+ f_imap->selected->uidnext = strtol (value, NULL, 10);
}
else if (strcasecmp (subtag, "UIDVALIDITY") == 0)
{
/* Followed by a decimal number, indicates the unique
identifier validity value. Refer to section 2.3.1.1
for more information. */
- char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp);
- f_imap->selected->uidvalidity = strtol (value, NULL, 10);
+ char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp1);
+ if (value)
+ f_imap->selected->uidvalidity = strtol (value,
+ NULL, 10);
}
else if (strcasecmp (subtag, "UNSEEN") == 0)
{
/* Followed by a decimal number, indicates the number of
the first message without the \Seen flag set. */
- char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp);
- f_imap->selected->unseen = strtol (value, NULL, 10);
+ char *value = strtok_r (NULL, " ", &sp1);
+ if (value)
+ f_imap->selected->unseen = strtol (value, NULL, 10);
}
else
{
- [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Paul Vojta, 2009/02/14
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/02/15
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Paul Vojta, 2009/02/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/02/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Paul Vojta, 2009/02/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x],
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Paul Vojta, 2009/02/20
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/02/20
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Paul Vojta, 2009/02/20
- Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/02/20