Re: problems with "mail"

[Jordi Mallach]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:47:19PM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:
> I've no objection to changing the option to --mailspool. It might be a little
> clearer. However, no amount of option naming will help users who don't bother
> reading the description of the option plainly printed to its right:
>    -m, --maildir=URL          use specified URL as a mailspool directory
>   --with-maildir=PATH     use PATH instead of /var/spool/mail
> 
> #139678 isn't even a minor bug, it's a confession he didn't read the usage
> messages.

I agree, but I think it be good to rename them, just to avoid
confusion.

> I guess Sergey will know whats up with mail.

Ok, thanks for the comments!

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez || address@hidden || Rediscovering Freedom,
   aka Oskuro in    || address@hidden      || Using Debian GNU/Linux
 Reinos de Leyenda  || address@hidden          || http://debian.org

http://sindominio.net  GnuPG public information:      pub  1024D/917A225E 
telnet pusa.uv.es 23   73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC  2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E

pgph0rewk28k4.pgp
Description: PGP signature