Re: Sergey(patch mbx_mbox.c)

[Alain Magloire]

> 
> 
> > It seems you got this backward, the function should return FALSE
> > if mud->size != size i.e. the size have change so the mailbox is not
> > updated and will need to be.
> Oops! I have been confused by function name: mbx_is_updated() seems
> to imply that the function returns TRUE when it founds the mailbox
> updated. I'm going to revert the sense of conditionals that check
> for mbx_is_updated(), then.

Yes, maybe the function is a misnommer how about:

mailbox_is_uptodate () ?

I will ask a native english person, my understanding of english
grammar is somewhat ... basic.

-- 
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on n'est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!