[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils/IMAP (2)
From: |
Alain Magloire |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils/IMAP (2) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:49:58 -0500 (EST) |
>
> [Alain Magloire]
>
> > imapd(UW c-client) also suppress a special message, this message serves
> > as a place holder for uivalidity and other things but I do not think
> > sending a message like that to an imapd will generate problem, I believe
> > it is discarded .. not sure.
>
> I think the "Folder internal data" message needs to be the first
> message in the mailbox for c-client to understand it.
>
> The "store state in a faked message" scheme breaks down big time when
> users access mailboxes via multiple paths, and not all paths "hide"
> the internal message. For that reason I don't think too highly of it.
Interesting comments.
Care to elaborate a little when you say "multiple paths".
--
alain
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, (continued)
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Jeff Bailey, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Harald Meland, 2001/01/15
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2),
Alain Magloire <=
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry, 2001/01/15
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/15
- mailutil/X-UIDL, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/15