bug-lispm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: re-booting from keyboard


From: Mete Balci
Subject: Re: re-booting from keyboard
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 16:28:42 +0100

I think it is nice to have CMCM because it was how hardware worked.

I disabled CM, CCM and CMM, they will not work.

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 2:01 PM Björn Victor <bjorn@victor.se> wrote:
Somehow I don't feel it's as important to be able to reboot from the keyboard as it was when the machine was on another floor or in the next room or something. I'd say c-m-c-m could be the only chord, with a "meta"(!) c-m-c-m binding which you could put on F12 or whatever (please don't hardwire it). If that would be available, having a reboot on c-c-m or c-m-m would be more of an annoyance than a help?

-- Björn

On 2024-12-08 20:25, Mete Balci wrote:
I think I would like to keep MCCM, but I will add a check so if it is only MC it will not work. I can still add F12 combinations as alternatives.

On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 8:14 PM Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
   Yes and no. Because ctrl and meta are freely assignable, the only
   reasonable check is I think to check if all ctrl and meta keys are
   down. So if only a single ctrl and meta are mapped (e.g. only left
   ctrl and left alt), then it would also cause a boot. But the
   default mapping is both ctrl and alt keys. So I think my question
   then would be: if c-m-return and c-m-rubout should not reboot in
   any case, then I can prevent single ctrl and meta mappings to
   trigger a reboot. In this case there will be no boot function from
   the keyboard. Would it be better ?

What about doing something like F12-Return / F12-Rubout that does
M-C-C-M-Rubout/Return combination?  Most modern-ish keyboards barley
differentiate between right/left buckies.

We definitly do not want M-C-Return / M-C-Rubout stop working.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]