Re: 64 bit MacOS version + Apple Silicon version

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu> writes:

> On 4/22/21, 9:49 AM, "Bart Kummel" <bart@kummelweb.nl> wrote:
>
>     I think you should re-consider this comment: "The other option is ditching
>     LilyPad and doing a Darwin-only version of LilyPond, assuming that we can
>     do this with suitably free components.", by David Kastrup. I don't think
>     many people are using the limited editor LilyPad. There are a lot of 
> better
>     tools available (Frescobaldi). I'd rather have a native LilyPond without
>     the *Pad, than having to compile it myself or rely on a Docker solution.
>     
> This implies that the only reason we need Apple's SDK is for compiling
> the LilyPad editor.  Is that true?

I think there were also native font libraries involved but they might
likely be replaced with more generic ones at some loss of versatility.

-- 
David Kastrup