Re: Missing dot

[Peter Toye]

Dear Jean,

It seems to have been there for 10 years!

Thanks for the workaround.

Best regards,

Peter
mailto:lilypond@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com

-------------------------
Thursday, April 1, 2021, 10:50:06 AM, you wrote:


> Le 15/02/2021 à 12:50, Peter Toye a écrit :
>> The following minimal criminal loses the dots at the end of the  G in the 
>> final chord. It seems the \hideNotes also hides the dot in the 2nd voice. 
>> I'd like to get it back please.
>>
>> \version "2.22.0"
>> \language "english"
>>
>> {
>>    \clef "treble"
>>    <<
>>      {
>>        g'2( a'2 \hideNotes g'2.)
>>      }
>>      \\
>>      {
>>        f'1~ <f' g'>2.
>>      }
>>    >>
>> }
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>> mailto:lilypond@ptoye.com
>> www.ptoye.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> bug-lilypond mailing list
>> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


> Hello,

> That's somewhat expected. The dots from the two notes are
> merged through killing one, and it happens to be the one
> from the lower voice. As a workaround, don't use \hideNotes,
> or cancel part of its effects, like this:

> \version "2.22.0"


> {
>    \clef "treble"
>    <<
>      {
>        g'2( a'2
>        \hideNotes
>        \revert Dots.transparent
>        g'2.)
>      }
>      \\
>      {
>        f'1~ <f' g'>2.
>      }
>    >>
> }

> This issue is already in the tracker:

> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1048

> Best,
> Jean