bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: set-global-staff-size rejects set-global-fonts settings


From: Malte Meyn
Subject: Re: set-global-staff-size rejects set-global-fonts settings
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:15:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2

Hi,

please always answer to the list.

Am 18.10.19 um 12:03 schrieb CieMaKat .:
Thanks for your answer -- that's it. I couldn't find such restriction in the documentation.

I'm facing another problem, which is related to the previous one. Looks like notation font is not scalled correctly.

You have to set #:factor. That’s another thing that might need better documentation?

#(define fonts
  (set-global-fonts
    #:music "gonville"
    #:brace "gonville"
    #:factor (/ staff-height 20 pt)))

But maybe we should make a feature request for both “problems”:

1. Setting the staffsize shouldn’t reset the fonts.
2. Manually setting #:factor shouldn’t be necessary because it’s always (/ staff-height 20 pt), isn’t it?

Cheers,
Malte

Minimal example the same as before with \paper section moved to the very bottom and staff size changed to 10:

        \version "2.19.83"


        #(set-global-staff-size 10)

        \score {

           \relative c' { c d es fis }

        }

        \paper {

           #(define fonts

             (set-global-fonts

              #:music "gonville"

              #:brace "gonville"

            ))

}

Here's a result of Gonville:
image.png

The problem does not occur with default typeface (whole \paper block commented out):
image.png

pt., 18 paź 2019 o 11:25 Malte Meyn <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> napisał(a):



    Am 18.10.19 um 10:54 schrieb CieMaKat .:
     > Hi there.
     > I found that use of set-global-staff-size or
    layout-set-staff-size makes
     > set-global-fonts irrelevant.

    The order is important: The font settings have to come *after* the
    staff
    size.

    I’m not sure whether this really is a bug or just not well documented …

    _______________________________________________
    bug-lilypond mailing list
    address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
    https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond



--
/M.Ciesiółka/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]