[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ET microtonal notation
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: ET microtonal notation |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:03:25 +0100 |
> On 23 Feb 2016, at 18:45, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 23.02.2016 18:26, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> SMuFl has been discussed for inclusion into the Unicode standard [1], in
>> addition to numerous discussions on the LilyPond User list [2].
>
> Yet it is not supported by (core) LilyPond (yet).
It might be good for the future, but the stuff I tried works with LilyPond
2.19.18.
- Re: ET microtonal notation, (continued)
Re: ET microtonal notation, Hans Åberg, 2016/02/23
Re: ET microtonal notation, Hans Åberg, 2016/02/23
ET microtonal notation, Hans Åberg, 2016/02/23