[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180) |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Dec 2014 21:41:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
> Federico Bruni <fedelogy <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Il giorno ven 26 dic 2014 alle 23:32, Trevor Daniels
>> <t.daniels <at> treda.co.uk> ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Was this regtest never executed before being committed?!
>>
>> Well, at least by the automatic doc build:
>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4176#c2
>>
>> It seems that it doesn't occur in any situation:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-10/msg00071.html
>>
>
> It seems that we knew about these problems, bug then added the
> regression tests anyway.
>
> We have bug-reports, so it seems we lose no information
Bug reports or an actual issue in the tracker?
> if we avoid these issues in the regression test, but the last time I
> tried that I got
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-11/msg00559.html>
There was no attempt of even making a tracker issue that time as far as
I can tell, it was strictly a sweep-under-the-rug approach.
I consider it reasonable to reduce a regtest to trigger the issue it is
intended for, but if it shows an unrelated problem, we should not remove
it without creating an issue report for it.
--
David Kastrup
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/27