[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fingering placement problem
From: |
Nick Payne |
Subject: |
Re: Fingering placement problem |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:22:53 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote:
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the
notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each other
(see https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then
the numerals default to being placed much higher above the noteheads
than is normal or if either of the notes in the second is omitted from
the chord:
\version "2.15.43"
\relative c'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\override Fingering #'staff-padding = #'()
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##f
<d-0 c-3 f,-0>4 <d^0 c^3 f,-0> <d^0 f,-0> <c^3 f,-0>
}
A similar problem happens with fingerings where the same note is played
simultaneously on two different strings. This happens quite frequently
when transcribing the lute music of Silvius Leopold Weiss for guitar:
\version "2.15.43"
\relative c' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(down)
\override Fingering #'staff-padding = #'()
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##f
<d-0 d-4>4
}
test.png
Description: PNG image