bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simple bug report -- examples are out of date and require processing


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Simple bug report -- examples are out of date and require processing with the conversion script.
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:11:29 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:04:39AM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > By "always", you mean "until commit
> > 4e92d8b035235815fc55f2fe76505ca3db0f890d
> > which was on 2009-10-04", right?
> 
> The important ones are still in the regression test directory

Yes, but I'm pretty certain that the version of those files in the
regtests compiles correctly.  :)

> - I think they could have a subdirectory of their own, btw.

Oh, totally.  As well as renaming the whole tree to regtests/.
And moving log-only files to regtests/log/.  And enabling
#(warning-as-error) on any non-log-only-files.  And maybe making a
"known good version" of the entire pngs, so that potential regtest
checkers who know nothing about ancient notation can have a clue
whether "neumes are supported" in the current version is value
correct or complete bunk.  And maybe adding the music2xml stuff to
the regtest checker.

There's a *ton* of things I want to change in the regtests, many
of them dating back to 2007 or so, but even *I'm* not silly enough
to try starting that project while we're waiting to release 2.14
if there's no critical issues discovered in the next 10 days.  :)

Cheers,
- Graham



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]