[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: desired behaviour
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: desired behaviour |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:31:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 01:49:58PM -0800, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:12:56 -0800, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> >It seems to me that it would be a good idea to have some sort of
> >illustration of desired behaviour as well as errant behaviour in bug
> >reports. However, we need to beware of putting extra work on the bug squad,
> >or stopping users reporting bugs simply because they don't have the skills
> >to produce a view of what "good" looks like.
>
> Using the tracker, it doesn't need to be the bug reporter
> himself who describes the good behavior, but anybody who cares
> and understands how music should be engraved.
Perhaps the thing to do is to add a brief note to the website "bug
reports" page, inviting people to submit "desired behaviour" to
the tracker for accepted issues. Maybe as an optional step 4,
placed in a box at the bottom of the page?
Cheers,
- Graham
- desired behaviour, Keith OHara, 2011/01/07
- Re: desired behaviour, Joe Neeman, 2011/01/08
- Re: desired behaviour, Phil Holmes, 2011/01/08
- Re: desired behaviour, Keith OHara, 2011/01/08
- Re: desired behaviour,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: desired behaviour, Graham Percival, 2011/01/09
- Re: desired behaviour, Keith OHara, 2011/01/10
- Re: desired behaviour, Graham Percival, 2011/01/11
- Re: desired behaviour, Keith OHara, 2011/01/11
- Re: desired behaviour, Graham Percival, 2011/01/11
- Re: desired behaviour, Keith OHara, 2011/01/12
- Re: desired behaviour, Graham Percival, 2011/01/12