Re: Strange behaviour with transposing clefs

[Phil Holmes]

Already reported and fixed, thanks. 
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1177


--
Phil Holmes


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick McCarty" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with transposing clefs


On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and 
> found
> that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you 
> actually
> get 2. Trying 2 gives no clef at all. Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives
> a clef but no transposition.
>
> I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8 
> actually
> moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a
> fiddle factor without checking the result. Not convinced anyone will use
> these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug?
>
> \relative c' {
> \clef treble
> c c c c
> \clef "treble^0"
> c c c c
> \clef "treble_2"
> c c c c
> \clef "treble_0"
> c c c c
> \clef "treble^2"
> c c c c
> }

This appears to be a bug.  I'll look into it shortly, though I can't
file a proper report at the moment.

Thanks,
Patrick