Re: ties and barline checks

[Victor Eijkhout]

On Sep 2, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Graham Percival wrote:

> That has nothing to do with timing; the beginning slur should be
> attached to the note before the bar check.

Indeed, it should, but it isn't because lilypond refuses to typeset  
this.

(In other words, I have no idea what you're trying to tell me.)

If you remove the bar lines in this bit of code, it typesets it  
perfectly. I don't see why the presence of the barlines is so  
objectionable, and definitely not how it leads to an unexpected paren.

Victor.

> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:59:09 -0500
> Victor Eijkhout <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Personally, I don't find the barline checks here objectionable:
> >
> > \score { <<
> >
> >  \relative c' {\time 2/4
> >    <c e c'>2 | (<c e c'>4)
> >    <a d f>4 | (<a d f>2)
> >  }
> >
> > > > }
> >
> > \version "2.11.39"
> >
> >
> > but lilypond seems to think otherwise:
> >
> > Parsing...
> > tie.ly:4:16: error: syntax error, unexpected '('
> >    <c e c'>2 |
> >                (<c e c'>4)
> > tie.ly:5:15: error: syntax error, unexpected '('
> >    <a d f>4 |
> >               (<a d f>2)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond