[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regressions: lyrics-after-grace.ly
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: regressions: lyrics-after-grace.ly |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:46:00 -0800 |
I don't think this is necessary; if it works for aftergrace, it'll
work for grace as well. If it would be useful to add an extra
test, I'm sure that Han-Wen will do it.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:17 -0600
Stan Sanderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2.11.38 regression/lyrics-after-grace.ly
> (confusing?)
>
> "Lyrics are ignored for aftergrace notes."
>
> The test verifies the statement; however, the rendered example
> appears to be a normal grace note tied to the second "c." Only the
> fact that the grace note is closer to the first "c" than the second
> gives it away. Perhaps the test could be expanded (or a second test
> added) to demonstrate that
> "Lyrics are ignored for grace notes, including aftergrace notes."
>
> Stan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond