[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feta20.enc not found
From: |
David Bobroff |
Subject: |
Re: feta20.enc not found |
Date: |
10 Apr 2004 19:26:08 +0000 |
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > It's a bit annoying that RedHat hasn't seen fit to update this package in
> > their distribution. Then again, RedHat 9 will see no more updates/errata
> > fixes after the end of this month anyway so maybe I should look for a
> > different distribution. Before I do that (and what distros have a fairly
> > recent tetex?) can I simply grab all the tetex-*-2.0.2-* rpms and install
> > them or am I likely to run into a cascade of rpm dependencies? (I hate it
> > when that happens.)
>
> your best bet would be the tetex from Fedora core 1, because it is
> closest related to RH9.
Ok, do I need anything other than the obvious (obvious = tetex-*)?
-David
- Re: feta20.enc not found, (continued)
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/07
- Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/10
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10
- Re: feta20.enc not found,
David Bobroff <=
- Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10
- [OT]Re: feta20.enc not found, David Bobroff, 2004/04/10
- [OT]Re: feta20.enc not found, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/10