bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: /etc/profile.d/lilypond.sh is a bad idea


From: Reuben Thomas
Subject: Re: /etc/profile.d/lilypond.sh is a bad idea
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:37:21 +0100 (CET)

> I welcome all proposals for better solutions,

Doing what Jan suggested, at least in the RPM, seems to be a good way of
sorting things out, at least for RPM-ed systems. After all, it's
reasonable to have only one version of lilypond installed as an RPM.

If people want multiple versions installed (with all but one being local)
then installing them in separate TEXMF trees is reasonable. So that could
remain the default for building from source.

-- 
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/
lawyer, n.  one paid to make the inexcusible incomprehensible




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]