[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-libunistring] Fwd: Disagreement between libidn2 and Python idna
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-libunistring] Fwd: Disagreement between libidn2 and Python idna |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:07:35 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-193-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Tim Rühsen wrote:
> From what I can see in the libunistring sources, it is based on Unicode
> 9.0.0
Correct.
> while 0x7fd has been introduced with Unicode 11.0 [2].
Yes, apparently so, when you look at http://www.unicode.org/charts/ .
> So something here might be out of sync.
Yes, it is inevitable that different software supports different
versions of Unicode. Unicode is an evolving standard.
> if there are any plans to upgrade to Unicode 11.0.
To me, adding a sensible API for meta-information on Emojis
has higher priority than just updating the table to Unicode 10, 11, 12.
The latter is useful only for a very small number of use-cases.
Bruno