Re: ctime uses in inetutils

[Simon Josefsson]

Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities
<bug-inetutils@gnu.org> writes:

> FYI, I have reluctantly needed convince myself that inetutils has bugs
> related to ctime for years < 1000 or year > 9999 and that this is
> something that needs to be fixed rather than ignored as irrelevant
> (which was my initial reaction):
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-02/msg00029.html

Oops, that link should have been:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-02/msg00027.html

/Simon

> We should fix these and other uses, but I don't want to uglify the code
> too much, so I'm exploring what a good upgrade path could be:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-02/msg00030.html
>
> I thought I'd mention this on the inetutils list now rather than later;
> feel free to chime in on the thread if you have thoughts.
>
> /Simon
>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature