bug-inetutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-inetutils] [SCM] GNU Inetutils ... inetutils-1_8-126-ge18e45f


From: Mats Erik Andersson
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] [SCM] GNU Inetutils ... inetutils-1_8-126-ge18e45f
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:09:29 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

måndag den 24 oktober 2011 klockan 13:48 skrev Alfred M. Szmidt detta:
>    I agree -- is there any reason we really need autoconf 2.68 instead of
>    2.67?  My system is a Debian Squeeze as well, so I only have 2.67
>    installed.
> 
> It was what I had installed (I install everything from source in
> $HOME/local so..), so I picked that.  I'll lower it to 2.67 if that is
> fine with everyone.

Observe that "configure.ac" only stipulates "AC_PREREQ(2.59)".
The leap to "2.67" is still questionably large.

Regards,
  Mats



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]