[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building inetutils from 2000-11-07 CVS
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Building inetutils from 2000-11-07 CVS |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:04:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.1.4i |
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 09:30:08AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:34:32AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > > I've been trying to think of a way to get rid of this FAQ, but I can't
> > > think of a good one. Do you think it would be worth making a hack so
> > > that if a .cvsreadme exists, it's spit out to the screen using some
> > > available pager? (Does anyone know if CVS is even still under
> > > development?)
> >
> > What about old-fashioned explanations in README-alpha or so?
>
> We should probably write our directions in README-alpha better no matter
> what. I just wonder if people will read it.
Doesn't matter. If they don't read it, we can cut our reply to "Read
README-alpha", which is already a gain. www.gnu.org/software/devel also
needs a link to a working archive of the (bug-inetutils) mailing list.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de