|
| From: | Luca |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9 gnumach] Add i386_fsgs_base_state |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:33:46 +0100 |
Hi! Il 18/02/23 21:37, Sergey Bugaev ha scritto:
+struct i386_fsgs_base_state {
+ unsigned long fs_base;
+ unsigned long gs_base;
+};
The fs and gs registers are also set by i386_REGS_SEGS_STATE. If they are better set separately (as it seems from the other patch, but I don't really know the glibc hurd part) should we remove them from the i386_REGS_SEGS_STATE case for x86_64, to avoid conflicts?
Luca
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |