bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH hurd 6/12] hurd: Fix modes_t and speeds_t types on 64-bit


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH hurd 6/12] hurd: Fix modes_t and speeds_t types on 64-bit
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:30:06 +0100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 12 févr. 2023 19:13:58 +0300, a ecrit:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 6:22 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> 
> wrote:
> > I'd rather say drop the "long" part, to avoid having to pull the
> > stdint.h header in.
> 
> That's what I meant, yes.
> 
> > Nowadays' BSD headers just use the int type,
> > notably.
> 
> So given that the Linux port has its own bits/termios.h, is it fine to
> just modify the generic one inline, rather than creating a
> Hurd-specific version?

Yes.

> The patch for that follows.
> 
> Sergey
> 
> -- >8 --
> 
> From 625b774141823a8f504cce8a92b9f45f5e6f050f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:08:57 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] hurd: Fix tcflag_t and speed_t types on 64-bit
> 
> These are supposed to stay 32-bit even on 64-bit systems. This matches
> BSD and Linux, as well as how these types are already defined in
> tioctl.defs
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
> ---
>  bits/termios.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/bits/termios.h b/bits/termios.h
> index 4439c2f1..6a883ceb 100644
> --- a/bits/termios.h
> +++ b/bits/termios.h
> @@ -99,13 +99,13 @@
>     `tcflag_t', `cc_t', `speed_t' and the `TC*' constants appropriately.  */
> 
>  /* Type of terminal control flag masks.  */
> -typedef unsigned long int tcflag_t;
> +typedef unsigned int tcflag_t;
> 
>  /* Type of control characters.  */
>  typedef unsigned char cc_t;
> 
>  /* Type of baud rate specifiers.  */
> -typedef long int speed_t;
> +typedef int speed_t;
> 
>  /* Terminal control structure.  */
>  struct termios
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

-- 
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]