bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/5 gnumach] Progress with SMP revisited


From: Almudena Garcia
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 gnumach] Progress with SMP revisited
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:52:13 +0100

> However, with ncpus>1 and apic enabled, there are warnings spewed
> at beginning of gnumach regarding cpu_number, but doesnt prevent
> continuing to start of boot process.

:-)

Then, the next step (added to little refactors) will be add the APs to scheduler, using `slave_main()` function. 
After this, the AP will be available to the scheduler, which can assign process (or threads) to these.

El mié, 1 feb 2023 a las 11:27, Damien Zammit (<damien@zamaudio.com>) escribió:
This has been rebased onto master and reworked to address review.

Same tests applied as last time, same results as last time.

However, with ncpus>1 and apic enabled, there are warnings spewed
at beginning of gnumach regarding cpu_number, but doesnt prevent
continuing to start of boot process.

Damien




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]