[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy
From: |
Sergey Bugaev |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2021 19:21:39 +0300 |
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 9:38 AM Joan Lledó <jlledom@mailfence.com> wrote:
> El 24/10/21 a les 19:50, Sergey Bugaev ha escrit:
> > Naming: perhaps memory_object_create_vm_proxy ()? or even
> > memory_object_create_task_vm_proxy ()?
>
> I don't care about the name, you guys decide.
Actually, how about vm_region_create_proxy ()? It has a nice symmetry to it:
memory_object_create_proxy () — create a proxy for this memory object(s)
vm_region_create_proxy () — create a proxy for this VM region(s)
So we'd say that it's the '_create_proxy' part that is common between
the proxy RPC names, not the 'memory_object_' prefix. After all, the
proxy RPCs are not the actual memory_object_... () RPCs that memory
objects themselves implement.
Sergey
- Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, Joan Lledó, 2021/11/01
- Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, Joan Lledó, 2021/11/06
- [PATCH 1/2] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, Joan Lledó, 2021/11/06
- [PATCH 2/2] Memory proxies: Add support for anonymous mappings, Joan Lledó, 2021/11/06
- Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, Samuel Thibault, 2021/11/07
Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/11/01
Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy,
Sergey Bugaev <=