[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by s
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:37:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.30.4-1 |
Hi,
I'll take a look. Maybe these issues are causing the SIGILL errors in the gcc
libgo tests. BBL.
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 00:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could somebody give this a try?
>
> Samuel
>
> samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, le dim. 20 janv. 2019 16:48:19 +0000, a ecrit:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24110
> >
> > --- Comment #3 from Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> ---
> > Created attachment 11553
> > --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11553&action=edit
> > proposed fix
> >
> > So AIUI the issue is just that SS_DISABLE is missing in the flags?
> >
> > Could somebody test the attached patch?
- [Bug hurd/24110] New: SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, bruno at clisp dot org, 2019/01/20
- [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, address@hidden, 2019/01/20
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/22
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Joshua Branson, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/25
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/25
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28