[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Fri, 2 May 2014 10:53:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 10:03:23 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Apr 2014 10:39:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > > - Without split stack enabled around 70 libgo tests pass and 50 fails,
> > > most of them with a segfault.
> > > - Enabling split stack and using the libc Samuel built all 122 libgo
> > > tests fail with a segfault.
> >
> > Please provide segfault backtrace, rpctrace, etc. Otherwise we won't be
> > able to help you.
>
> You already have one in this thread, analysed by Justus:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01736.html
Yes, but that stack was without split stack fixed. The backtrace you
have just attached seems different.
Samuel
- patch1.diff updated + test results Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, (continued)
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/20
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/21
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Samuel Thibault <=
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02