[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filen
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff] |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:43:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Zhang Cong, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 19:36:02 +0800, a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
> wrote:
>
> Samuel Thibault, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 11:31:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > Zhang Cong, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 17:25:34 +0800, a écrit :
> > > The one who do this need have the full plan,
> >
> > I don't see why one would need a full plan.
>
> Putting it another way, I don't think anybody has the full plan. Which
> is fine, all medium-to-big projects are like that.
>
> Driver related idea may need a full plan:)
Again, no. Drivers can work the way they prefer. The driver
infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which
need their own. For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan
by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory
allocation issue.
Samuel
- Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff, (continued)
- Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/06
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/06
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff],
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Justus Winter, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/07