[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD
From: |
Richard Braun |
Subject: |
Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:42:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I can't really imagine what issue you have in mind. To fit with the
> convention in NPTL for extensions, it should be PTHREAD_CANCEL_POLLED_NP.
> (The "_NP" suffix indicates it's a non-POSIX feature.)
What would you recommend we name the matching pthread_cond_wait-like
function ? Something like pthread_cond_poll_np ?
--
Richard Braun
- PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Thomas DiModica, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Roland McGrath, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Roland McGrath, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Roland McGrath, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/03
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/11
Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/03
Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD, Richard Braun, 2012/08/07