[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hurdextras in git?
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: hurdextras in git? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:56:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:19:46AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> > > > > They have some very interesting translators, and these should be
> > > > > easily available.
> You mean Git submodules? Yeah, that's an option worth considering. I'm a
> little undecided on submodules vs. monolithic repo. (I definitely
> dislike the idea of completely independant repos.)
OK -- we do agree on that submodule one. (Isn't it nice?) ;-)
My idea has always been to have such stuff in separate submodules, and
then have a overlying project (the top-level hurd.git one) that contains
a bunch of submodules (various translators; everything that's
intersting), can serve as sort of a tested distribution (because the
submodules are versioned), plus adding build machinery /
cross-compilation support, etc. Just added:
<http://www.bddebian.com:8888/~hurd-web/open_issues/populate_hurd_git_with_submodules_etc/>
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: hurdextras in git?, Thomas Schwinge, 2010/07/14