[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtrivfs broken?
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: libtrivfs broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:38:04 -0800 |
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 00:23 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> > What makes you think that's a bug?
>
> I don't know if it's a bug actually, I mentionned I wanted to study the
> problem. Still, it seems weird that fsysopts isn't able to get the control
> of a node which belongs to the user. Any reason for this behaviour ?
The node doesn't "belong to the user"; the filesystem does not know or
care what access permissions are there in the upper-level filesystem.
It is in *that* filesystem which the user is marked the owner; not in
the running trivfs filesystem.
So you need to ask the upper level filesystem for it: since you are the
owner of the upper-level node, you can call file_getcontrol on the
upper-level node.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- libtrivfs broken?, Ben Asselstine, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Richard Braun, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Richard Braun, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Richard Braun, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/02/19
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Richard Braun, 2007/02/20
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/02/20
- Re: libtrivfs broken?, Ben Asselstine, 2007/02/19