[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:51:33 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Leonardo Pereira <leonardolopespereira@gmail.com> writes:
> I wrote the previous email with haste, so I could not explain my idea
> completely and, with your doubts about it, I can explain it better.
> I know that there are A LOT of scripts that will need to be CORRECTED.
> I do not think that keep a loop symlink of USR->/ is a good idea,
> since you will never be able to do a "find / -name *something*". So,
> we need to correct those scripts. (* There are scripts with references
> to /usr/python or /usr/local/perl)
This is entirely incorrect. Find knows perfectly well how not to
cross symlinks.
- Re: No to StowFS!, (continued)
- Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Message not available
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/03