[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:24:02 +0100 |
> And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if
> such support is needed.
Or you could frob bash's she-bang parsing.
Easier to frob exec. Then all shells that do hash-bangs will follow.
Make exec strip the leading directory, and then you have something
like `#!foo', which exec is already nice enough to handle for us. It
will look through PATH for `foo', and run it if it was found.
Not sure if this is ugly or not... Or if it will break things...
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02