[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pthread headers
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: pthread headers |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:20:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:55:22 +0100,
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> If someone is bored, then they can fix the pthread headers to be C90
> compliant. C90 disallows the use of the "inline" keyword.
>
> Many programs still like to use -ansi, so this break compilation of
> those on GNU/Hurd since our pthread headers aren't C90 compliant.
I wonder if the best approach would be to just s/inline/__inline__/ in
the public headers. gcc allows this even in -ansi mode (unlike just
inline).
Perhaps Roland can comment in his infinite glibc design experience.
- pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/10
- Re: pthread headers,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: pthread headers, Roland McGrath, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11