[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: userspace drivers
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: userspace drivers |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:06:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:11:47AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Of course it will, but that doesn't mean that the Hurd repository is the
> right place for them. Almost all of the code in the Hurd repository
> (with some notable exceptions, like some CMU code that's still around
> and the pfinet server) has had its copyright assigned the the FSF. This
> makes it easier to defend in court.
>
> Most of the drivers probably won't have their copyrights assigned. That
> might make it problematic to include them in the main Hurd tree.
I don't think copyright has anything to do with it. Drivers can just as wel
be GPL'ed and assigned to the FSF as any other source code.
The separation is still useful: A driver framework can be useful for more
than one project. It doesn't need to be tied to the Hurd.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Re: userspace drivers, Robert Millan, 2003/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: userspace drivers, Robert Millan, 2003/02/06
- Re: userspace drivers, Niels Möller, 2003/02/06
- Re: userspace drivers, Robert Millan, 2003/02/06
- Re: userspace drivers, Niels Möller, 2003/02/06
- Re: userspace drivers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/02/06
- Re: userspace drivers, Niels Möller, 2003/02/06